Put an agent on it.
Agents, when and where you need them.
The work you’d hand to an agent is the work that never fit your systems. It lives in the spreadsheet bridging two applications, or in the inbox where approvals actually happen. That’s Shadow ERP™, and most agents can’t reach it. They ship with a fixed menu of actions, and anything outside the menu goes back in the IT queue.
A Nextworld agent starts with a working set of tools, delivered through MCP, the open standard for connecting AI to business software. It can query your data, act on your records, and use what the platform already does, from the moment it exists. And when a request runs past anything it was set up for, the agent writes its own logic and runs it in a governed sandbox, computing the answer rather than guessing at it.
1 click
100%
2-way
24/7
Agents already doing the work.
Real processes, handled by agents the process owners built themselves.
The hard part is already done.
From any application, one click stands up a working agent in under a minute, already connected to that application’s data and equipped with the tools to use it. The setup other platforms treat as the project is the part that’s already finished.
From there you shape how it behaves. A persona defines what the agent is responsible for and how it approaches the work. Skills give it consistent handling for multi-step tasks, including when to step in and when to ask first. One agent can carry a lot on its own, and when work runs past what it’s responsible for, it hands off to another.
Ask it, or don’t.
Some agents work in conversation. Ed, named for Nextworld’s founder, is the assistant reachable from anywhere on the platform: you ask, and he handles what he can or routes the rest to whichever agent fits. Others never get asked at all, and run on the schedules and triggers you set.
AI you can account for.
Every step, traced.
Open a run and read it message by message: each tool call, each model call, how long it took, what came back. The same view shows what’s waiting on your input, what ran clean, and what errored, per agent or rolled up across all of them. That includes the ones that ran on a schedule overnight, which you can read the next morning like any other run.
Every credit, counted.
Watch what an agent consumes as it works, down to the agent, the conversation, and the user. You’ll know what a process costs to automate before you scale it across the business.
That’s real ROI: return on intelligence, on the record.
FAQ
No. What you need is to know how the process actually works, including the exceptions nobody wrote down. Agent Builder lives in Developer Studio, and everything you’d touch there is plain language or drag-and-drop. From any application, one click stands up a working agent that already understands that app’s data. You write its persona in a sentence or two, describing what it’s responsible for and how you want it to work. Skills are written the same way, in the instructions you’d give a new coworker handling a multi-step task. No code, no data science background, no platform certification. Your job is the judgment. The platform handles the configuration.
Developer Studio →
No. Nextworld sits alongside the systems you already run, and agents reach into them rather than around them. That’s the point: most of the work worth automating lives in the gaps between your systems of record, which is exactly where Shadow ERP took root. Agents work in those gaps. Your ERP keeps doing what it does well, and the processes it was never built to handle stop running on spreadsheets and inboxes.
Two answers, and both matter. First, you decide in advance where an agent needs a person. Require sign-off before anything sensitive, and the agent stops and asks instead of proceeding. Some actions can’t be undone once they’re taken, which is the reason that checkpoint exists where you put it. Second, you can see exactly what happened. Every run is traced step by step, including the ones that errored, so you’re diagnosing a specific tool call rather than guessing at a black box. Errors surface in the same view as everything else the agent has done. You’ll know what broke, where, and what the agent was working with when it broke.
Different jobs, same platform. Agentic development builds software: you describe an application in plain language, and a coordinated team of AI agents specifies, builds, tests, and delivers it. The output is a production-ready app. Agents are the other side of that, working inside your operations rather than producing software. They read documents, post transactions, monitor conditions, and handle the processes your applications support. Build an app with agentic development, then put an agent to work in it.
Agentic Development →
Ed is how you reach everything. He’s the assistant available from anywhere on the platform, and he answers what he can directly, then routes the rest to whichever agent handles that kind of work. He reaches every agent on your platform, including the ones your team builds. So building an agent doesn’t mean adding another interface for people to learn. It means Ed can now do something he couldn’t do yesterday, and the people using him don’t have to know which agent picked up the request.
The platform abstracts the model away, and that’s deliberate. You aren’t locked into one provider’s roadmap, and your agents get better as the models underneath them get better, without anyone rebuilding what you’ve already put to work. The model is an implementation detail we manage so you don’t have to. What stays constant is everything around it: the same permissions, the same audit trail, the same traces, regardless of what’s doing the reasoning.
You’ve already got an agent in mind.
-10.webp)